Please note: After several successful years, the Open Minds blog will be closing. For further details, please visit our FAQ

Currently showing: Other


24 Mar 14 15:12

This is the message conveyed by an article in the latest edition of the Economist.

Entitled the "The trillion-dollar gap", the article cites a World Economic Report which says that global spending on transport, power, water and communications is a whopping USD one trillion less than what it should be.

According to the paper, the problem is not just confined to emerging economies but is also prevalent in developed countries such as the U.S. It writes: "With the economy weak and borrowing cheap, it is daft that that America's public infrastructure spending is at a 20-year low, even as the country's roads, bridges and dams are rated only D+ by the American Society of Civil Engineers."

The challenge, says the Economist, is not only tapping public money for the necessary investment but also accessing private capital. The big global banks who used to finance infrastructure projects are now less inclined to do because of the new "Basel 3" capital rules which have made lending less attractive. The paper says that the USD 50 trillion or so managed by institutional investors such as insurance companies and sovereign wealth funds could provide a solution. It points out that currently less than one percent of this amount is earmarked for infrastructure investment.

The Economist article also casts a direct spotlight on the recent Swiss Re publication, "Infrastructure Investing. It matters".
"http://media.swissre.com/documents/Infrastructure_Investment_IIF.pdf

Published in conjunction with the Institute of International Finance, the Swiss Re study emphasizes that long-term investing is vital for economic growth. A key plank in the proposals put forward by the report's authors is a private/ public initiative which would leverage the infrastructure finance expertise of international financial institutions, including insurance companies, and multilateral development banks. Ultimately, the report says, such collaboration could help establish a transparent and harmonized infrastructure asset class of the kind needed to close the funding gap.


Category: Other


1 Comment

Laurent Degoumois - 25 Mar 2014, 10:38 a.m.

Indeed, the global discussion on infrastructure investing and the need for policy action has further gained momentum. The existence of a significant financing gap as well as the importance of unlocking the non-bank institutional investor asset base has been well recognised and documented, most recently in a WEF report ("Infrastructure Investment Policy Blueprint") and The Economist ("Infrastructure financing - a long and winding road").
As outlined in the joint Swiss Re/IIF publication "Infrastructure Investing. It Matters", current annual infrastructure spending of USD ~2.6trn will need to increase to over USD 4trn by 2030. These funding requirements can only be met if current impediments to infrastructure investing are addressed: A new asset class of a global infrastructure bond market is needed. By increasing the pool of investable longer-term assets, the large asset base of long-term oriented institutional investors can be activated. Furthermore, leveraging the expertise and credibility of International Financial Institutions (IFIs) will help to promote standardization.
In its meeting in Sydney, the G20 has explicitly reiterated its commitment "to creating a climate that facilitates higher investment, particularly in infrastructure and small and medium enterprises". Furthermore, the G20's call to enhance "the catalytic role of multilateral development banks" is encouraging in that respect. Now, time has come to turn words into action.


If you would like to leave a comment, please, log in.